When you are claiming direct discrimination at Tribunal, you want to clearly argue that you have been treated unfairly because of a protected characteristic. This is usually because of a protected characteristic that you have, but it could also be a protected characteristic that you are perceived to have, or because of someone you’re with or connected to. For example:
With direct discrimination, your employer can be liable for the acts of its employees, as well as the employees being personally responsible.
You don’t need to attach evidence to a Tribunal ET1 claim, but it’s a good idea to back up your claims by mentioning the evidence you intend to use. For direct discrimination claims, people typically refer to evidence such as text messages, emails, letters, meeting notes and witness evidence.
If you’re successful in a Tribunal claim, you will be awarded a “remedy”. This mainly includes financial compensation, like loss of earnings. It can also include some non-financial remedies too.
Some of the key remedies you can ask for at Tribunal are:
As well as the common remedies that you can ask for, discrimination-specific claims also have the option to include an “injury to feelings” remedy. This is compensation which you can be awarded when you have been hurt or distressed because you have been discriminated against.
Injury to feelings is generally awarded within one of three “Vento bands” depending on severity.
For example, 16-year-old Josip won £2,500 for injury to feelings when he was subjected to direct age discrimination. The company ended his apprenticeship contract stating that he “had a lot of maturing up to do”. As well as this he also successfully made a claim for breach of contract.
The Tribunal said the injury to feelings award reflected the damage to his confidence as described by him in evidence and as reflected in his giving up hopes of becoming a joiner and taking employment in a supermarket for now.
Total award: £575
Outcome: the Tribunal found that not selecting her because of her sex was direct discrimination.
Total award: £11,000
Outcome: the Tribunal found that this amounted to direct pregnancy and maternity discrimination. On appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, they found that it was possible that this could also be indirect discrimination too.